The aftermath of the family and care referendums has left a trail of political surprises. Despite receiving endorsements from the three Government parties, Sinn Féin, and various campaign groups, the proposed constitutional amendments faced defeat, with victory claimed by those advocating for a "No" vote. Key figures and groups played pivotal roles during the campaigns, influencing public opinion and contributing to the outcome.

Michael McDowell: A seasoned political figure with a rich background as attorney general, minister for justice, and tánaiste, McDowell showcased his intellectual prowess on constitutional matters. His consistent presence in the media, questioning the definition of "durable relationships" and challenging the Yes campaign's portrayal of article 41.2, resonated with voters.

Peadar Tóibín: Leader of Aontú, Tóibín found himself in the spotlight, advocating for a No-No vote – a stance unique to his party. Departing from Sinn Féin in 2018 due to differences on the abortion referendum, Tóibín capitalized on these campaigns, suggesting that Aontú may have a better understanding of public sentiment on certain issues.

Tom Clonan: A fresh face in Seanad Éireann since March 2022, Clonan's arguments on the care referendum struck a chord with the public. Drawing attention to the proposed article 42B as potentially reinforcing an ableist view, Clonan's insights gained traction, contributing to the strength of the No campaign.

Maria Steen: No stranger to referendum campaigns, Steen, associated with the conservative Iona Institute think-tank, played a significant role in the No side during the latest debates. Her notable performance in an RTÉ Prime Time debate, particularly against Tánaiste Micheál Martin, showcased her ability to influence undecided voters.

Flac (Free Legal Advice Centres): Flac, an independent legal advice organization, presented a legal analysis supporting the proposed family amendment but rejecting the care amendment as "ineffective" and "implicitly sexist." This unexpected position dealt a blow to the Yes campaign, emphasizing the importance of clean information from reliable sources.

Equality Not Care: This group specifically campaigned for a No vote in the care referendum, criticizing the proposed amendment as ageist and ableist. Comprising concerned citizens, disabled individuals, and family members, Equality Not Care argued against the notion of disabled people being perceived as burdens on families.

These key players and groups, each with distinct perspectives and arguments, contributed to the defeat of the proposed constitutional amendments, leaving observers and the public with much to ponder in the aftermath.